Skip to content


2 Approaches To Early Resolution And Cost Savings For Litigation Guidelines

Let’s State The Obvious: Early Mediation Can Lead to Lower Costs of Defense

Most insurance and claims adjusting companies have Defense Counsel Guidelines.  I’ve seen many of them.  It’s hard to remember, though, seeing one in which a contingency plan for early settlement was addressed.

Most guidelines I’ve seen are focused on having a case evaluated for settlement at 6 months.  By that time, your defense counsel will have interviewed the client, propounded initial discovery, received and reviewed the medical records and taken the plaintiff(s)’ deposition(s).

Perhaps you could reduce your ALAE significantly by including early mediation in your guidelines. (Transparency caveat:  I’m a mediator and I have a bias.  I mediate cases nationwide.)

2 Ways To Include Mediation In Attorney Guidelines

Here are two suggestions.  One is fast-tracking that process to 3 months.  The second is requiring your lawyer to approach plaintiff’s counsel about mediation within the first 6 months.

  • Fast tracking settlement.  In three months, it’s unlikely you’ll be able to get all of the medical records and receive responses to discovery and take the plaintiff’s deposition.  Ask yourself, though, if you really need all of that information to settle the case.  In some cases, particularly cases of clear liability, the answer is:  probably not.  Yes, you may settle some cases for a little more than having all of the usual discovery would suggest.  On the other hand, plaintiff’s counsel may be willing to take less money in return for not having to work the case up.  You will also be saving attorneys’ fees and litigation costs and closing files.
  • Mediation date within 6 months. There seems to be an institutional bias against the defense being the first side to suggest a mediation.  The underlying fear is that plaintiff or her counsel will conclude your case is weak and their settlement aspirations will zoom skyward and their bargaining posture will harden.  Do you have any data to support that bias?  I haven’t seen any.  Try it out, then calculate your overall savings.

I applaud all sides when they come to me to mediate a case either pre-suit or very early on in the litigation.  I try to set the expectation that the exploration of settlement at an early stage is an opportunity for both sides to be realistic, not only about the value of the case, but also about saving litigation costs.

Print This Post Print This Post

Posted in Mediation & Settlement, Negotiation, SPOT on Costs.

Tagged with , , , , .


5 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Christian Stegmaier says

    Right now, there are a ton of client risk managers applauding this entry.

    I very much like the idea of putting mediation on the calendar right off the bat. The author suggests 6 months. I’ve been working on a 270 day timeframe. Either way, getting the mediation scheduled up on the front end give the defense counsel something tangible to be working towards rather than just letting the case float along until it gets on a trial calendar or it hits an ADR deadline.

  2. Nancy Hudgins says

    Hi, Christian!
    Thanks for stopping by.
    It’s a mind set to develop, not only for your claims department, but also as an expectation for your panel counsel.
    Good luck!
    Best,
    Nancy

  3. jatmiko says

    Why my lawyer always buying time when mediation still in progress ( almost 1 year ) it seems the the lawyer trying to litigation ways , can anybody help me ???

  4. Attorneys Dubai says

    This text is priceless. How can I find out more?

  5. Marc Lanzkowsky says

    Feel free to contact me at marc.lanzkowksy@fticonsulting.com



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.

Captcha Captcha Reload